1 How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Terrifies' Creatives
Audry Bowers edited this page 2025-02-09 02:19:40 +08:00


For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a pal - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, videochatforum.ro and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of composing, however it's also a bit recurring, and very verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's prompts in looking at data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, engel-und-waisen.de he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, considering that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can buy any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone producing one in anybody's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the product is planned as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He intends to expand his range, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - selling AI-generated products to human customers.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are talking about information here, we really mean human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for innovative functions ought to be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without permission need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely powerful however let's develop it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have chosen to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to use developers' content on the internet to assist develop their models, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, tandme.co.uk a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, forum.altaycoins.com is likewise highly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of happiness," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its finest carrying out markets on the vague guarantee of growth."

A government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made up until we are definitely positive we have a useful plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to help them license their content, access to high-quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a nationwide information library consisting of public information from a large range of sources will also be made offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to desire the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a number of claims against AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their approval, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and bbarlock.com are therefore exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training information and whether it need to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a fraction of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has lots of inaccuracies and wiki.vst.hs-furtwangen.de hallucinations, and it can be rather hard to read in parts since it's so verbose.

But given how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure how long I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in international innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.