freedomtv

For Christmas I received a fascinating present from a pal - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a couple of basic prompts about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of writing, however it's likewise a bit recurring, and very verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repeated hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI -book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, because rotating from putting together AI -generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can buy any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in anyone's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, developed by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is meant as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He wants to broaden his range, creating different categories such as sci-fi, and maybe using an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - offering AI-generated items to human clients.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are talking about data here, we in fact suggest human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI -generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and morphomics.science they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think the usage of generative AI for innovative purposes must be banned, however I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without permission ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really effective however let's develop it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to utilize developers' material on the web to assist develop their models, demo.qkseo.in unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of happiness," states the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its best carrying out industries on the vague guarantee of growth."

A federal government representative said: "No relocation will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a useful strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to help them accredit their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a national data library consisting of public information from a wide variety of sources will likewise be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a number of claims against AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their approval, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it need to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector thatswhathappened.wiki over the previous week. It became one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a fraction of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather hard to check out in parts since it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm unsure the length of time I can stay positive that my substantially slower human writing and modifying abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.